No, I can't. I don't think anyone can.
Not even the BIG PLAYERS could keep up with this chaotic and idiotic Savings Clause.
Gawd, I admire Donna Maria. Attorney, Wife, Mother, Small Business Advisor and Advocate and Former Soap and Cosmetic Maker. Bonus Points for being a concise, to the point rebuttal expert.
I'll let her tell it to you:
While you're watching this, I'm off to go look up ALL of the who's who in the Legislative Land of MO and while I'm at it, the folks who run AgMissouri and the Missouri Farmers Market Bureau.
Sandra
Gawd, I admire Donna Maria. Attorney, Wife, Mother, Small Business Advisor and Advocate and Former Soap and Cosmetic Maker. Bonus Points for being a concise, to the point rebuttal expert.
I'll let her tell it to you:
While you're watching this, I'm off to go look up ALL of the who's who in the Legislative Land of MO and while I'm at it, the folks who run AgMissouri and the Missouri Farmers Market Bureau.
Sandra
Posted by Sandra at 08-05-2010 02:28 AM 
Categories: Pet Peeves, Regulatory
Tags: farmers markets legislation idiocy run amuck
Categories: Pet Peeves, Regulatory
Tags: farmers markets legislation idiocy run amuck
Trackbacks
-
08-10-2010 04:23 AM
BLOG.BOTANICABASICS.COM wrote:
In the midst of this urgent issue of knocking back the Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010 (for brevity, I'll just refer to it as the SCA 2010), I've found that many consumers don't realize this idiocy will not do one thing to make cosmetics "safer" for consumers. The Cosmetic Industry is not making products to harm their customers. Any who did that would go broke in under a year. What the SCA seems to be attempting is to be a combined American form or mirror of the EU's Cosmetic Directive and REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical substances). Try reading these and keep your head from hurting. -
08-10-2010 04:31 AM
BLOG.BOTANICABASICS.COM wrote:
In the midst of this urgent issue of knocking back the Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010 (for brevity, I'll just refer to it as the SCA 2010), I've found that many consumers don't realize this idiocy will not do one thing to make cosmetics "safer" for consumers. The Cosmetic Industry is not making products to harm their customers. Any who did that would go broke in under a year. What the SCA seems to be attempting is to be a combined American form or mirror of the EU's Cosmetic Directive and REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical substances). Try reading these and keep your head from hurting.
Comments